Review of “Frankenstein”
We all know the story of “Frankenstein”. A mad scientist creates a monster, or is that the real story? Dr. Henry Frankenstein, played by Colin Clive, could be seen as the real monster of this movie. He seeks to create a man after his own image with out reckoning upon God, as Dr. Waldman (played by Edward
Van Sloat) says in his opening monologue. There are two stories here. One story about Dr. Henry Frankenstein and one story about his so called “monster”.
The futility of Dr. Frankenstein’s
story is seen from the very beginning. First by him and his assistant Fritz going
through the trouble of digging up a dead body that had only just been buried a couple of minutes before. Then the bumbling Fritz steals a criminal brain after dropping a normal brain. Dr. Frankenstein’s ambition is to be God. He says himself
that he seeks to destroy life and then recreate it with his own hands. This is
the futility of his scheme and he is banned from the university he works at after they call him “insane”. After the monster is created Dr. Frankenstein does indeed exclaim, “now I know
what it feels like to be God”. This is the age old story of the finite
attempting the grasp the infinite.
Dr. Frankenstein’s creation is considered
to be a “monster”, but is he really? Since the first time I saw the
movie I have said that Frankenstein is not a monster, he’s just misunderstood.
His first act of violence is actually done in self-defense. When the town
folks see him the react with horror due to not understanding what they are seeing. It
is only when they threaten him with fire that the monster turns violent giving the people the justification they sought to
destroy something simply because it was foreign to them. Indeed, Dr. Waldman
is the real monster here. Seeking to build on Dr. Frankenstein’s experiments
after the doctor has a change of heart and vows to never do it again. The subject
of Dr. Waldman’s experiments is Dr. Frankenstein himself. Indeed, the man
who sought to be God is no the victim of another man with the same drive. Dr.
Waldman does not get far with his experiments. When the monster sees him cutting
on his own creator the monster kills Dr. Waldman. This killing is only in defense
of his creator.
The monster becomes frightened by
what he has just done and runs away. Then we come to the classic seen where the
monster meets the little girl by the lake. The girl, in her childhood innocence,
is not frightened by the monster. On the contrary, she takes him by the hand
and invites him to play with her. The throw flowers into the lake because they
like to watch them float. The monster runs out of flowers. Thinking the girl is pretty like the flowers and not knowing she won’t float the monster throws her
in the lake. The girl, of course, drowns both to her horror and the monster’s.
Dr. Frankenstein forms a lynch mob and
vows to kill the very monster he has created. Again, we see the doctor seeking
to make life and then take it as he sees fit. This leads to the climatic showdown
between the doctor and his creation. Boris Karloff’s performance
as “the monster” is truly a work of art. His performance is completely
non-verbal and he does a magnificent job at display a range of emotions from happiness to anger and fear without the use of
words. Frankenstein is a masterpiece and has the distinction of being the only
horror movie on the AFI’s top 100 movies of all time!
Bride of Frankenstein
Not everything is as it seems. We think the “monster” is dead,
not so. Dr. Frankenstein, the real monster from the first movie, is struck with
guilt over having attempted to be God. Enter Dr. Prictorious who was Dr. Frankenstein’s
teacher at the university. He states that he too has created life and seeks to
enter “a new world of gods and monsters”.
The “monster” seeks to redeem himself from his actions in the first movie.
Instead of drowning a girl, he saves a girl from drowning and the people lock him in a dungeon for it. As if that could hold him. Then we come to what I believe
is one of the most beautiful character interactions in all of cinema. The “monster’
is drawn to violin music coming from a cabin. The source of this music is an
elderly man who is blind and who is thus not frightened by the “monster”.
The man believes that the “monster” is simply a man who is mute.
The innocence of disability welcomes the “monster” with no strings attached. Indeed, the man exclaims that the “monster” is actually God’s answer to his prayer for
a friend. The man teaches the “monster” how to talk and about companionship. Unfortunately this happy scene is interrupted by two men who issue their own judgment
on the man’s new friend.
The “monster” decides that the only suitable friend for him must come from the dead. This is where his path and that of Dr. Prictorious collide. Dr.
Prictorious uses the “monster” for his own evil means to kidnap Dr. Frankenstein’s wife in order to bribe
Dr. Frankenstein to make a bride for the “monster”. The creation
of the Bride is the ultimate traumatic end for the “monster”. The
Bride screams at the “monster” who interrupts this as her rejection of him.
Then something very interesting happens. The “monster” decides
to end it all by destroying the castle and all who are in it. But before he does
he lets the doctor and his wife go but not Dr. Prictorious. The end of the monster(s)
is also the end of all who would seek to be God!
Review of "Nashville" 2 Stars
I know I am going to be the odd ball out
on this but I did not like Nashville
at all. While there were some humorous moments they were too few and far between. I've read that the story of "Nashville"
is set against the backdrop of country music. On the contrary, the country music
is in the form of a movie. It was like watching a three hour country music video! Of course it's well known that there are various stories happening in this movie and
I read that they all come together at the political rally. But they did not come
together. Just because all the characters happened to be in the same place doesn't
mean their stories come together, nor is there any closure to their stories. Now
I do agree that Robert Altman is one of the best directors in history, but he blew it on this movie.
Pale Rider 3 Stars
A town is terrorized by a ruthless
baron, Josh LaHood, and a girl prays for a miracle. Miracles do not always appear
as we expect them to. The Pale Rider is a preacher who does not fit the idea
of what a preacher should be. He is a violent gunslinger who is the answer to
a prophecy that the girl quotes from the book of Revelation, “and I saw a pale horse and the rider was death and hell
followed with him”.
The baron seeks to control the town
and he knows that the Rider is going to stand in his way so he tries to bribe him by offering to build a church. The Rider does not want to fight the people’s battle for them but rather he wants them to stand together. When they vote to stand together he disappears and they wonder how they are going
to stand without him. They miss the point that their power comes from within
them, not the Rider. This is what LaHood fears for he knows that with faith the
people will be unmovable. When Barrett and the Rider stand together they defeat
the evil holding the town at bay.
Tess 3 Stars
I was not familiar with “Tess of
the de’urberlvilles” so this story was brand new to me, and a tragic story it is.
I really felt for Tess who wants the better life that her parents wanted for her but every time she turns around everyone
she comes into contact with victimizes her. Even the parson’s son, Angel,
who claims he will love her no matter what leaves her when he learns of her illegitimate child. Tess seems to be thrown into one bad scenario after another and none of it is do to anything she does. She bears the shame from her priest, her husband, and her community for having the
child out of wedlock and conceiving it with her distant cousin. Never mind the
circumstances under which the child was conceived. It could have been considered
a rape and may have been if she had resisted during the actual encounter the same way she resisted the cousin’s advances
leading up to the encounter. The movie is brilliantly photographed, acted, and
directed. I was completely drawn to Tess and her story. I do have one criticism of the movie though. The movie
sets up a moral conflict between Tess, the priest, and the community over the way the child was conceived. But as soon as this conflict is presented it is dropped and the movie shifts to Angel’s story when
I was much more interested in Tess.
Review of “The Exorcist” 4 Stars
Hailed by many as the scariest movie of all time, and with good reason. “The
Exorcist” made in 1973 still holds up today. The only real problem that
I have with it is the opening sequence which is in the restored version but was not in the original and it is not needed in
the restored version either. In this opening sequence Father Merrin (Max Von
Sydow) spends several minutes at an archaeological dig. The only part of the
sequence that contributes to the movie is that last shot when Father Merrin stands directly across from the statue of the
demon, the same likeness that appears on Reagan’s walls later in the film. This
shot sets up the showdown between Father Merrin and the demon.
Even before things get really bad there are subtle signs that things are not fine in Reagan’s world. Her mom hears noises in the attic but there are no rats. Her
mom finds Reagan in bed with the window wide open and the covers off. Reagan
goes into her mom’s room because Reagan’s bed is shaking. Then there’s
also Captain Howdy which is not as imaginary as Reagan’s mom thinks he is. And
how could we forget Reagan’s “accident” at the party?
What we are dealing with here is spiritual warfare. Reagan’s mother
spends a great deal of time searching for physical and psychological answers to a question that is spiritual in essence and
of course these other explanations ultimately come up empty. One question that
is not answered in the movie is “why Reagan?”. And perhaps the answer
to this question isn’t that important.
For 1973 the special
effects are incredible. Marcel Vercoutere gives some of the greatest special
effects ever put on film. Reagan’s head doing the 360, Reagan’s backwards
spider walk down the stairs, Reagan spewing blood, Reagan elevating above the bed, and her pure white eyes.
The final showdown
is too terrifying, too complicated, too superb to try to put into words. It’s
one for the cinema record books!
The Lost Weekend 4 stars
Before "Leaving Las Vegas" there was the
"The Lost Weekend". This movie hits you across the face from the very beginning
and never lets go. Wilder's brilliant directing let's us see the protaginist's
fall before he does. We want to save him from it but feel powerless to do so. He is an alcoholic who pushes everyone he loves away and is even willing to ruin his
career just to get that next drink. Like all great movies love saves the day.
The Field 4 Stars
Great script, great acting, great story,
and brilliant cinematography. It really draws you in and makes you care about
the main character and his land. It sparks important questions. What is the purpose of land? Is land just a piece of property/capital
or is it a link to one’s heritage. A link that one would do anything to
preserve.
Edward Scissorhands 4 Stars
This movie is brilliant in every
way. Brilliant use of color. Brilliant
cinematography. While this film can be considered science fiction it also has
significant threads of disability theology. Is he a freak of nature or is he
just different? Should he be like everybody else?
The religious fanatic in the film refers to him as a “perversion of nature” that should be “cast
out” of the neighborhood as if he were some kind of demon. Dianne Wiest
and her family are the only ones who view his “non-comformity” as part of his created being. Not something that needs to be fixed. Tim Burton tells this
story through the use of both the written word and the visuals. It isn’t
very often that the visuals actually become an integral part of the story. The
story has obvious links to “Frankenstein”. He is a creature created
by man which by default makes him incomplete. He is not a monster but it is people’s
reaction to him that turns him into a monster. While I am not a big Tim Burton fan, he overdid himself with this film. Without a doubt his best film!
Children of a Lesser God 4 stars
First of all let me say that Marlee
Matlin is a brilliant actress and does not get enough credit or roles. Her character
has had a difficult life. The result of this is resentment and fear of connection. She has been through so much hurt that she has put up emotional walls to prevent that
from happening. She wants to enter into a relationship with William Hurt but
to do so would require her to tear down those walls. Because of her hurt and
pain she is afraid to give herself completely to love. She is also afraid to
make love. Boys from her childhood only see her as easy sex. She has only known sex from the physical aspect, not the emotional aspect.
Once she puts down her walls she is able to give herself to an emotional and physical relationship with William Hurt. The physical love scene cannot even be described as a “sex scene”. It is not about sex or lust. It is about
love and passion and is absolutely beautiful!
Closer 4 stars
“Closer” is a very complicated
movie about relationships which is difficult to put into words. There is so much
there I can’t put my finger on all of it. There is only a five person cast
with the fifth person being a taxi driver. The cemetery is like a set of book
ends which brings the movie together. There is also a string holding the movie
together which is the line spoken by Natalie Portman: “Everything is a
version of something else”. The cemetery contains people who
died saving the lives of others. Who saves who in the film? At times the answer is obvious and at times it is not obvious at all.
There is one physical life saving event. The rest is emotional. Portman’s character has deep hurt for unknown reasons, she has the need to love and to be loved but
she also has the need to control the relationship. When someone else tries to
control she leaves.
In Bruges 1 Star
It is one of the worst movies I've ever seen! Granted the plot is at
least a good idea but it is carried out with outlandish incompetence! The screenwriter was either a complete idiot or
high. The script is a sub average script to to begin with but it was like they wrote the script then they took a whole
bunch of "f" words, threw them in and were they landed that's were the put them. I am not one to criticize movies for
violence or language. I watch countless numbers of movies and I have only criticized two movies for excessive violence/language..."Last
Man Standing" and this piece of trash! After I realized I wasn't going to like the movie I decided it would be fun to
just count the ridiculous number of times the "f word" was used...119 times!!! 6 times in the first two minutes.
Now that's some creative writing there!
My top movies by year
2008:
Slumdog Millionaire (BP)
The Reader
Seven Pounds
The Air I Breathe
Frost/Nixon
2007:
In order
Atonement
Reservation Road
Juno
The Brave One
Amazing Grace
2006:
Little Miss Sunshine
The Black Dahlia
Click
Babel
The Departed
2005:
Crash
Good Night & Good Luck
Munich
Everything Is Illuminated
Falling Angels
2004:
I, Robot
Passion of the Christ
Finding Neverland
The Forgotten
The Aviator
2003:
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
21 Grams
House of Sand and Fog
Thirteen
Gods and Generals
2002:
The Pianist
The Hours
The Lord of the Rings: The Two
Towers
Gangs of New
York
Orange
County
2001:
A Beautiful Mind
I Am Sam
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring
Hannibal
Shrek
2000:
Gladiator
Pay It Forward
Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon
XMen
Erin Brockovich
1999:
American Beauty
The Green Mile
Girl, Interrupted
Tea With Mussolini
The Insider
1998:
Saving Private Ryan
Life Is Beautiful
Simon Birch
Pleasantville
American History X
1997:
Titantic
As Good As It Gets
Good Will Hunting
Scream 2
Romy and Michelle’s High School Reunion
1996:
The War at Home
Ransom
Jerry Maguire
The English Patient
Shine
1995:
Braveheart
Leaving Las
Vegas
Crimson Tide
Richard III
12 Monkees
1994:
Forrest Gump
The Shawshank Redemption
Nobody’s Fool
Quiz Show
Interview with a Vampire
1993:
Schindler’s List
Philadelphia
The Fugitive
Fearless
Map of the Human Heart
1992:
1991:
Silence of the Lambs
Fried Green Tomatoes
Regarding Henry
Sleeping with the Enemy
Frankie & Johnnie